Friday, 30 September 2011

BSM Research Associates

BSM Research Associates Subsites: OPERA and FACEBOOK

clifford.paiva@gmail.com

(661) 370 1482

CLIFFORD ANTHONY PAIVA FACEBOOK

MOKELE-MBEMBE RESEARCH:

Source: Japanese Exploratory Expedition; Lake Tele; Republic of the Congo

Neck-to-body length to body ratio correct for sauropod (incorrect for elephant). Video is obtained by Japanese exploratory expedition to Lake Tele, Republic of the Congo. Gradient edge (high pass filter) is applied to the video. 

Clifford Paiva: NOTE: This is probably a sauropod (Mokele-mbembe). Aside from the very high propensity of people to believe a LIE (evolution pseudo-science model); NOTHING precludes the reality of the presence of these animals on the planet. (01/31/12)

Monday, 27 September 2010

Pterosaur Eyewitness Accounts; Plesiosaur Attacks

BSM RESEARCH ASSOCIATES HOMEPAGE

CLIFFORD ANTHONY PAIVA: FACEBOOK

Since evolution is nothing more than mankind's imaginative fantasy...a pseudo-science paid for by the public...it is not surprising that NO TRANSITIONAL FORMS FOR PTEROSAUR have ever been found.

Pterosaur Perth Australia.pdf

PENETRATION OF SATURATED PTEROSAUR TARGET SOURCES:

After many attempts using image processing routines in PHOTO-SHOP, SCION, and GIMP...internal structure within the frequently observed saturated double sources have been resolved into separate emission lines. This may be interpreted generally as head, wing and tail areas of the animal. This technique, used from GIMP in the Auto Color Enhanced option revealed the internal morphological features.

NO TRANSITIONAL FORMS EVERY FOUND FOR PTEROSAUR (no kidding...wonder why?...)


Lake Champlain Photograph Taken by Sandra Mansi in June 1977:  Morphology Extraction by BSM Research Associates under supervision of Clifford Anthony Paiva (15-21 July 2011)

 

 THE SANDRA MANSI LAKE CHAMPLAIN PLESIOSAUR FRAME:


The Sandra Mansi photograph obtained in June 1977 reveals a distinctly structured morphological plesiosaur head. The frame with the white backround is determined to be only first order; therefore only the general morphology of snout, eyes and mouth are readily observed.  Reptilian features may be artifacts of image processing, nevertheless the general facial features remain accurate.   None of these characteristics appear in the initial frame of course, but rather are extracted from image processing techniques performed at BSM Research Associates, using software at Edwards Air Force Base Flight Test Center, California.

Some folks (apparently evolutionist-oriented types)  think that the above frames are floating tree logs or UFOs with aliens inside, and  from galaxies beyond ...not to despair though since adequate mental help for those suffering from evolution disorientation (ED) is readily available...under Obama Care...of course.  Unfortunately this medical care option does not apply to evolution-addiction, (EA) which is a much more serious affliction;  the only hope of cure being actually attacked and eaten by a plesiosaur or pterosaur.



Imagery: Lift Force Capability (Cattle and Deer);  Yakima Forest; Spokane, WA

Possible Plesiosaur Attacks: Vancouver Area

Video 2: Plesiosaur Attacks in Vancouver Area

Missing: Matthew Huszar Since 16 December 2011

Sunday, 28 June 2009

Clifford Anthony Paiva_BSMRA: Image Processing of Current Sightings of MEXICO FLEET Chemiluminescent Pterosaurs (Ropens) Observed in Stephensville,Texas; Guadalajara and Mexico City, Mexico; Papua New Guinea, and San Francisco, California. (Seen On The History Channel's Monsterquest Flying Monsters.)

Back to BSMRA Main Site: BSMRA.org

Image processing for this section is implemented by myself; the hardware and software computer integration being provided by my son, Mr. Alexander Mitchell Paiva (a computer firmware and software specialist), specifically for The History Channel's Monsterquest Flying Monsters program.  Hydrodynamics of lift forces, coefficients of lift as a function of pterosaur wing area, and overall dive velocity profiles were included in the follow-up technical report to be released the Fall of 2009. Correlations to North America include the Great Lakes region, Sonora Desert (Guadalajara, Mexico and Stephenville, Texas), and Southern California, and Great Britain. Note that the so-called UFO Fleet observations are really high altitude flying animals which are flocking and may be mathematically modelled.  The animation graphically portrays the groupings and flight units.



 
 



BSMRA_Pterosaur Lift Forces.doc



BSMRA_High Resolution for Head and Tail Flange Regions.PDF


BSMRA_HIRES frames for PNG GL and Stephenville.doc



BSMR_These are the latest correlations for Great Lakes and Stephenville.doc
Monsterquest Link to Flying Monsters.doc


 

 




BSMRA_Pterosaur Rhamphorhynchus UFO Fleet Observations.doc

Clifford Anthony Paiva RESUME 2009.doc

Your Smiling Cousin.doc

Update Technical Report Release Available: Open Letter Regarding Great Lakes Sightings; Stephenville, Texas and Papua New Guinea Relationship to Noah's Ark Ministries International (NAMI) Expedition

California Inland Seas; Journey of Coronado Chapter 10, 1540; Giants in California 

Cliff: Video taken at night in Stephenville, Texas and the Paul Nation video from Papua New Guinea are very similiar. Both reveal internal structure which may be a tail and flange section in chemiluminesence. (06/30/09)

Cliff: Rather than remove another wise good slide let me correct the error on the Papua New Guinea-Gates frame. It should state a June 2007 date...not 2008. Thanks... (07/16/09)

Sunday, 05 April 2009

Clifford Anthony Paiva_BSMRA: Results of Investigations Regarding Pterosaur Sightings in Papua New Guinea: A Technical Report (Clifford A. Paiva, BSM Reserch Associates; Harold S. Slusher, University of Texas at El Paso, Physics Department

clifford.paiva@gmail.com

(661) 370 1482

 
 
Enclosed are the updated BSMRA_image processed frames addressing electromagnetic extinction (absorption and scattering) in the .39-.78 micron bandpass; target source separation, and source phase and intensity variations.  The general conclusions remain consistent with the initial report.  Variable intensities and phase (on-off frequencies) from the target sources, changing with respect to each other, significantly lowers the probability that automobile lights are the sources of the BSMRA_Indava emissions.  Obscuration of source 1 (see frames below) by near-proximity flora is low since vegetation would immediately absorb and scatter incident radiation from the source one, away from the receiving camera, causing a step function (immediate) intensity reduction to zero.  As the frames indicate starting at 1 second, the lowering of intensity from source one is gradual, being more indicative of obscuration by clouds.  The proximity of clouds near source one however would certainly lower the intensity of source two commensurately .  This is not indicated in the Paul Nation Video so the possibility of obscuration by clouds is removed. This report is being integrated into Papua New Guinea /Sierra Nevada, CA and San Francisco Bay, CA Ropen-associated frames recently obtained by BSMRA_BSM Research Associates for correlation analysis.

BSMRA_Paiva Slusher Pterosaur Ropen Technical Report.doc

CNN Video of UFO Lake Erie: Just More Chemiluminescent Pterosaur Sightings Similar to Stephenville, Texas and Papua New Guinea.

 

 

 

Cliff: Much talk these days concerning aliens flying around Lake Erie. Not true...however ropens (pterosaur) seem to be inhabiting the area, as well as around Stephenville, Texas; New Mexico; Greater Sonora Desert, and Mexico. Even San Francisco Bay is involved. That Papua New Guinea has Ropen information is currently well known through History Channel's Monsterquest: Flying Monsters (03/19/10)

Friday, 03 April 2009

Clifford Anthony Paiva_BSMRA: Mesonychid = Chupacabra: Alive and Well In Texas

clifford.paiva@gmail.com

(661) 370 1482

BSM RESEARCH: CHUPACABRA 

BSMRA.org Related Site: Post-Deluvian Animals (Chupacabra)

Some folks (evolutionist types) have a hard time believing these animals exist.  Certainly no scientific reason to doubt their presence in the world today.  As in the case of all LIVING FOSSILS Chupacabras (not monsters of course) are sinoyx-mesonychids which are indeed very functional in  southwestern portions of the United States,  Central America and South America.  These are not, as History Channel's Monsterquest asserts...monsters...but rather mesonychids.  Evolution is again proven to be a fantasy.




BSMRA_Primary Chupa Mesonychid.doc


BSMRA_Cupacabra Mesonychids.doc

The Quest for Transitional Fossils Which Are NOT Just Drawings:

The "transitional" fossil drawing included here is another one of professor Miller's dream quests...just another drawing of course, however Dr. Miller has real faith in his charts.  (Note: Evolution is a religion, and evolutionists, strange as they are, really have marvelous faith.)  Interestingly enough the mesonychids which eventuall turned into whales are actually still ravaging the poultry farms in San Antonio, Texas.  Dr. Miller informed me on the phone that that's just not possible since these canine types evolved into whales along time ago (60 million or so years).  Well...since one can't argue with these folks bound for the Institute for Mental and Neural Assessment (IMNASS) I just said OK....and hung up the phone.

But on thinking the matter over I decided to help Dr. Miller out just a little by providing the REAL origin of mesonychids...and this is right down his line...they're from Carina Nebula some 7.5 (10)3 LYs!.  (Well 7,500 light years ain't so bad.)

 

Cliff:

Well...I am exceedingly glad I'm not an evolutionist, as these (previously assumed) animals keep popping up. When this happens the evolution pseudo-science model must again be modified, weakening the original model. Noah's Ark is of course the source mesonychids and pterosaurs and evolution is pure fantasy.


(04/03/09)

Clif: Here's a good one: A Chupi, a Pterodactyl, and a Equidae (ancient) horse, all very good friends, feel unappreciated and an unwanted by realistic people (this would be Creationists of course...), and wander into a bar looking for something to drown their sorrows. The bar tender asks the dejected "paleos"... "why all the long faces?!..." (04/03/09)

Cliff: Oh...and how does one define FAITH? Answer: Believe in your evolution illustrations and drawings which assume to create transitional fossil forms out of nothing...sort of like...say...God. (08/14/10)

Rick:

I want to believe in these things but I can't in good conscience swallow that fact that these animals are alive and well eating livestock in Texas. Coyotes and wolves do the same thing and we have millions of high resolution photos of them and tons of taxidermied and live specimens. There is no debate they exist not because of an evolutionist cover-up, but because they exist. Does this animal have magic powers conferred upon it from the pre-deluge unicorns that enable it to blur photos taken of it by modern camera equipment?

[CLIFF: Evolutionists are not scientists, that is folks who base their ideas on reality.  Some of the land animals disbursed from the Ark have become extinct.  It should be noted however that EXTINCTION requires universal knowledge...an animal...like a volcano...may be considered extinct one day...and found to be very alive and well the next day....plesiosaurs in Loch Ness...coelocanth and so on.  Diamond Head on Oahu is considered extinct...until it erupts of course.   Anyway I selected the best frames I could from the imagery available from the video.  Oh...I'm not interested in convincing you or anyone else of anything for two reasons: (1.) You believe what you DECIDE to believe...not INDUCED to believe; (2.) My interest is scientific, experimentally-based research.  If the reality of the Son of God and Creator becomes apparent scientifically, then I work within this framework.  If NO complex systems design engineering is indicated, I go with this.  To date all that I have observed in the biological and biochemical fields indicate the former.  If folks have a problem with where they came from; where they are today and where they may be going...well...that is their problem.  They aren't interested in my interests in any case.  Their war is with their Creator Who, by the way, isn't obligated either in convincing anyone of anything.]

(09/29/10)

Sunday, 01 June 2008

Clifford Anthony Paiva_BSMRA: Pterosaur Body Dynamics: Warm-Blooded Pterosaurs

 BSM RESEARCH ASSOCIATES HOMEPAGE
Zoom: Control +
Normal: Control 0
 
Courtesy of:
 
Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering: Pterosaur Flight Dynamics Assessment
 
Minimum hydrostatic lift zones in blue indicate glide efficiency of the pterosaur.  Note the body fuselage and central wing lift areas which enable maximum lift force for carrying prey.   The pteroid bone may extend forward to provide additional camber-lift for the animal.  This eliminates the need for an unnecessary long take-off run.  In Papua New Guinea and other areas sightings of these animals occur in high wind areas further enabling flight.

 
BSMRA_Ptero_Flight Dynamics.pdf
BSMRA_San Antonio Sighting Petrosaur.doc




BSMRA_HIRES Warm Blooded Endothermy Pterosaur.PDF
BSMRA_Soft Tissue and Pterosaur and Pterodactyl Fur ESM.pdf


Clifford A. Paiva_BSMRA: Debunking Evolution.PDF
Clifford A. Paiva_BSMRA:
Pterosaurs in Texas.doc
Clifford A. Paiva_BSMRA:
San Antonio Giant Birds and Pterosaurs.doc
Clifford A. Paiva_BSMRA:
FLYING Reptiles.doc
Clifford A. Paiva_BMSRA:
Alaskan Pilot Reports Giant Bird.doc
Clifford A. Paiva_BSMRA:
THUNDERBIRDS OVER ILLINOIS.doc

All BSMRA Sites

Cliff: The long face mentioned from Texas fits rather well for the ptero sighting. The somewhat accurate depiction from Jurassic Park III (included above) gives a general idea of a ptero type animal from the front., including what may appear as a man's elongated face. (06/11/08)

Cliff: Dimorphodon Macronyx uses both forward canard camber and rear flap aerodynamics. No long runways are needed, unlike the ubiquitous albatross. (09/10/08)

Cliff: Fur and hair on pterosaurae indicate internal temperature maintenance, not cold blooded characteristics. (09/10/08)

Cliff:

Explicitly stated: No transitional fossils (fractional developmental forms...say 33% feather and 67% scale) have ever been found. Therefore evolutionism may be regarded as pure fantasy...of course.  Again: Fractional forms of transitional fossils embedded in the globally distributed sediments are absolutely mandatory for such a notion as evolutionism.  No, the real problem is not with experiemtally-derived science...but rather with PSEUDO-SCIENCE.

Two errors frequently occur in attempting to get a handle on all of this: (1.) That God has something do to with religion...He doesn't. (2.) That evolutionism is some sort of science...WRONG...It ISN'T.  Evolution is function of ill-directed faith...a faith I might add which is completely devoid of validated evidence (transitional fossils NOT fully functionable).  I should confess on the other hand that I have immense enjoyment poking fun at evolutionists...as I'm absolutely convinced something is terribly wrong with their initial God-given ability to think straight.  Reptile "dinosaurs" (what ever those are supposed to be...) turning into birds! Or perhaps cows and dogs into whales!...or whatever the current silly model which has been promulgated by these "scientific" types...just sitting ducks for target practice! Don't get me wrong...believe anything you want folks...but I'd be a little cautious concerning relating your beliefs to experimental science which attempts to investigate the operations of exceedingly complex integrated biological systems. 

(06/29/11)

Tuesday, 27 May 2008

Clifford Anthony Paiva_BSMRA: Pterosaur, Pterodactyl; Ropen; Ramphorynchus; Genesis Park

Zoom: Control +
Normal: Control 0
Ongoing image processing at BSM Research Associates supports Mr. Garth Guessman's field expedition efforts to obtain definitive information optics data of post-deluvian pterosaur-type animals.  All frames included as data obtained from Genesis Park field research is obtained through the courtesy of Genesis Park's director G. Guessman.  The SCI-FI Channel frames indicate very positive correlation to the Genesis Park frames, especially in luminescence, hence the animals are probably the same. 

 

Clifford A. Paiva_BSMRA:Ptero_Data.pdf

Cliff: NOTE: The moon was registered by the RECONYX infrared camera as in very low crescent and OUT of the field-of-view. Also the similar conditions applied for the SCI-FI Channel camera. The frames are highly correlated both for the earlier (June 2007) and the Guessman frames (August 2007). (05/29/08)

Cliff: In each of the frames saturation effects are dominant; the internal structure of the targets not being observable. (11/04/08)

Sunday, 25 May 2008

Clifford Anthony Paiva_BSMRA: Flipper (not dorsal) of the Zuiyo Maru Catch

BSM RESEARCH ASSOCIATES HOMEPAGE

Dr. Robert Rines:

Dr. Robert Rines asked me (Cliff Paiva) to apply some image processing to the 1975 frame of the animal caught on Dr. Edgerton's submerged strobe camera.
The results of that analysis revealed an elasmosaur type animal reacting (see the bubble "wake" frames) to the strong flash.  Reflection is seen off of the animal and in the surrounding medium.  The animal differs from the Zuiyo Maru's catch two years later by Michihiko Yano of Taiyo Fisheries in that the animal in Loch Ness, and apparently other animals in the various Lochs of Scotland, in that the animal  Yano's animal is of a short-necked plesiosaur
 
Zuiyo Mary Catch:
The assessment of BSM Research Associates is that the animal caught on the morning of 25 April 1977, about 50 km. east of Christchurch, New Zealand by the Japanese fishing boat Zuiyo Maru, and  brought up from a depth of about 300 meters by April meters. Mr. Michihiko Yano (Section Chief for the Taiyo Fishery Company), is a short-necked variety of plesiosaur.  REASON: As the enclosed BSMR frames show, the so-called displaced "dorsal" fin is not displaced from the centerline spine of the animal. Neither blood nor torn flesh is between the flipper and centerline spine. Since basking sharks possess dorsal fins and the Zuiyo Maru catch does not, then the animal brought up from 900 feet depth is NOT a basking shark. Further the eyes of the Zuiyo Maru animal are very large in diameter; basking sharks have (seen enclosed frames) small eyes.
 
Goertzen Article:
 

Inspection of the Zuiyo Maru pictures reveals that the aquatic cryptid had a symmetrical pair of small upper fins on each side above the anterior flippers. If this observation is correct, then the identification of this animal as a basking shark is false. Previously, the fin of just one side was observed and wrongly identified as a shark's dorsal fin that had slid sideways from the mid-dorsal ridge. Examination of the original scientific report reveals that Yano, along with all the fishermen, observed a pair of upper fins. They specifically stated there was not a shark’s dorsal fin. That statement caused considerable discussion among the scientists who questioned them. Without a dorsal fin the proposed basking shark model is dismissed.  Another confirmation for the marine reptile understanding, and falsification of the shark idea, is a picture revealing the nare at the lower front of the skull. It is right where Yano sketched it, though that is not where it should be for sharks. Although this animal may not currently be identified with either living creatures or specific known fossils, it possessed characteristics like those of marine reptiles, perhaps similar to the Sauropterygia.

The idea that a dorsal fin existed, however, is disputed by eyewitness testimony as well as the pictorial evidence. M. Yano, who conducted the primary examination of the carcass, insisted that there was no dorsal fin (Omura et al., 1978). No one else present on the ship’s crew thought there was a (sharks) dorsal fin either (Obata and Tomoda, 1978; Omura et al., 1978). Evidently Yano’s testimony (along with that of the other fishermen) was rejected in favor of the dorsal fin theory...for obvious reasons.

Yano was questioned by Obata and Tomoda (1978, p. 45) regarding the upper fin(s) (B). Obata and Tomoda observed that the fin was considerably smaller than the anterior ventral propulsion flippers, and suggested that it was somehow the broken posterior ventral flipper (a hypothetical break accounting for its smaller size; B of Figures 2 and 3) overlaying an almost complete right anterior ventral flipper (C) of Figures 2 and 3). That judgment was denied by Yano, who stated that the supposed broken posterior ventral flipper of Obata and Tomoda was actually one of the paired upper fins which had an unusual array of exposed rays near its base as well as on its edge. This fin (B) is the same fin that other scientists thought was the dorsal fin of a shark that had slid sideways from the center. Those scientists correctly stated that it was located too far forward and displaced left of the center line on the body to be the posterior ventral flipper.

 


Clifford A. Paiva_BSMRA: Rines and Zuiyo Maru.pdf
 

Back to BSMRA Main Site

[All BSMRA Sites]


Zuiyo Maru Catch Plesiosaur Primary.pdf

Cliff: As Yano indicated to the science community, the photos taken by himselft on the Zuiyo Maru confirm the flipper is, as it should be, some distance from the animal's spinal column. Tissue is NOT torn as some folks assert, and as my image processing confirms. The tissue between the flipper and centerline of the animal is undisturbed. The animal does not possesses a dorsal fin and of course is not a basking shark. Also the diameter of the plesiosaur's eyes are vastly different than the very limited diameter eyes of a basking shark. (05/29/08)